COMPARITIVE STUDY OF TREE COUNTING ALGORITHMS IN DENSE AND SPARSE VEGETATIVE REGIONS

Khan, S.; Gupta, P. K.

Tree counting can be a challenging and time consuming task, especially if done manually. This study proposes and compares three different approaches for automatic detection and counting of trees in different vegetative regions. First approach is to mark extended minima’s, extended maxima’s along with morphological reconstruction operations on an image for delineation and tree crown segmentation. To separate two touching crowns, a marker controlled watershed algorithm is used. For second approach, the color segmentation method for tree identification is used. Starting with the conversion of an RGB image to HSV color space then filtering, enhancing and thresholding to isolate trees from non-trees elements followed by watershed algorithm to separate touching tree crowns. Third approach involves deep learning method for classification of tree and non-tree, using approximately 2268 positive and 1172 negative samples each. Each segment of an image is then classified and sliding window algorithm is used to locate each tree crown. Experimentation shows that the first approach is well suited for classification of trees is dense vegetation, whereas the second approach is more suitable for detecting trees in sparse vegetation. Deep learning classification accuracy lies in between these two approaches and gave an accuracy of 92% on validation data. The study shows that deep learning can be used as a quick and effective tool to ascertain the count of trees from airborne optical imagery.

Zitieren

Zitierform:

Khan, S. / Gupta, P. K.: COMPARITIVE STUDY OF TREE COUNTING ALGORITHMS IN DENSE AND SPARSE VEGETATIVE REGIONS. 2018. Copernicus Publications.

Zugriffsstatistik

Gesamt:
Volltextzugriffe:
Metadatenansicht:
12 Monate:
Volltextzugriffe:
Metadatenansicht:

Grafik öffnen

Rechte

Rechteinhaber: S. Khan

Nutzung und Vervielfältigung:

Export